“Perhaps He Did not Have Expertise In…”: Rahul Dravid’s Evaluation Of Vinod Kambli Resurfaces

After a video of Vinod Kambli’s latest public look got to the fore, a previous clip of Rahul Dravid sharing his views on the definition of ‘expertise’, mentioning Vinod Kambli’s identity, has resurfaced on social media. Kambli, a childhood good friend of the legendary Sachin Tendulkar, was one of many most talked-about cricketers when he arrived on the scene; however, he failed to take care of the stature. Regardless of enjoying 104 ODIs and 17 Checks for India after making his debut in 1991, Kambli’s worldwide profession couldn’t final even a decade.

Within the viral resurfaced clip, Dravid, who performed 509 matches for India apart from additionally teaching the senior group later, gave the instance of how Vinod Kambli had an unbelievable ‘ball-striking means’ however, in all probability, “did not have the expertise within the different areas to grasp what it took to be a world cricketer.”

“I believe we decide expertise is fallacious. What will we see as expertise? And I’ve made an identical mistake. We decide on expertise by folks’s means to strike a cricket ball. The sweetness or the timing of a cricket ball. That is the one factor we see as expertise. Issues like dedication, bravery, self-discipline, and temperament are additional skills. Once we judge expertise, I believe we have to take a look at the entire package deal,” he stated in the video.

“It is a laborious factor to clarify; however, some folks simply have the present of timing and ball-striking. Sourav Ganguly simply had that means to time a canopy drive. He simply had it. You could possibly see. Sachin has it. And Viru. You would not say that about somebody like Gautam (Gambhir) as much as you’d do for a few of these different guys. Not that Gautam is much less profitable. So that is what we see as expertise. We do not really have a look at the opposite aspect of expertise. We are saying a proficient participant did not make it. We at all times have a look at this aspect; however, possibly he did not have the opposite skills,” Dravid added.

Really feel like posting this as we speak.

Belief Rahul Dravid to say this so superbly.

Video courtesy: cricinfo.pic.twitter.com/bHjKCTHjSs

— Bishontherockz (@BishOnTheRockx) December 4, 2024

“I hate to make use of… however, Vinod’s in all probability been one of many nicest guys that I’ve met. Vinod had an unbelievable ball-striking means. I keep in mind a recreation in Rajkot, Vinod bought 150 in opposition to (Javagal) Srinath and Anil (Kumble). It was unbelievable. First ball Anil got here onto the bowl, he hit him straight into the stone wall. In Rajkot, there was a stone wall. He hit it and banged straight onto it. I imply we have all been shocked. Wow, it was superb. How do you try this? However, possibly he did not have the expertise within the different areas to grasp what it took to be a world cricketer and to cope with the stress and the strain. I can solely guess, however possibly Sachin had that rather more. That is why Sachin is the place he’s as we speak,” Dravid additionally stated.